<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NUTS &amp; BOLT(ON)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/</link>
	<description>a little bit of 'this', an adequate amount of 'that' and an unreasonable amount of the 'other'...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the olive ream</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>the olive ream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Ms. Isadora,
I haven&#039;t gotten around to writing about the UN because I am too busy writing about the missing 9 billion dollars of Iraq Oil revenues that the US Admin. cannot account for.

Yes, I see it a &quot;neocon&quot; plot in everything, including your post. Condi Rice put you up to this, admit it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Isadora,<br />
I haven&#8217;t gotten around to writing about the UN because I am too busy writing about the missing 9 billion dollars of Iraq Oil revenues that the US Admin. cannot account for.</p>
<p>Yes, I see it a &#8220;neocon&#8221; plot in everything, including your post. Condi Rice put you up to this, admit it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isadora</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Isadora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Mr. Olive Ream, 

If you really want to write a worthwhile article, why don&#039;t you write about the corruption in the UN? Mr. Savan, Oil For Food Program? Or do you just ignore anything that doesn&#039;t fit your agenda?

Never mind. You will probably see it as just another &quot;neocon&quot; plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Olive Ream, </p>
<p>If you really want to write a worthwhile article, why don&#8217;t you write about the corruption in the UN? Mr. Savan, Oil For Food Program? Or do you just ignore anything that doesn&#8217;t fit your agenda?</p>
<p>Never mind. You will probably see it as just another &#8220;neocon&#8221; plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sin</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Sin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-78</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m torn between laughing and crying as I read this.  But that&#039;s nothing new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m torn between laughing and crying as I read this.  But that&#8217;s nothing new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hani</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Hani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Considering that it was the US that created and funded these Mujahideen on an ongoing basis, they don&#039;t really have a right to mope over 9/11. What goes around, comes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that it was the US that created and funded these Mujahideen on an ongoing basis, they don&#8217;t really have a right to mope over 9/11. What goes around, comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daithí</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Daithí</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Omer, 

You mention Mr. Bolton&#039;s &quot;sordid past&quot;.

Wayne Madsen (http://waynemadsenreport.com) is confident of a sordid FUTURE as well:

&lt;I&gt;&quot;The swaggering dolt in the White House believes that his recess appointment (announced by the White House on Aug. 1) of the boorish John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, his mustachioed gunslinger and sworn liar will go to the East River in Manhattan and shake up the international organization and kick and whip them into kow-towing to the neocon line. What Bolton doesn&#039;t realize is that he will be be now working and living in a virtual fish bowl. Bolton will not only be under the scrutiny of intelligence agents that at least three-quarters of the 191 members of the UN place within their missions and the UN Secretariat and specialized agencies, but also the UN staff itself, an aggressive UN press corps, and an intensely anti-Bush population of New York City and its suburbs. So, if Mr. Bolton decides to engage in the type of group sex activities he once &quot;enjoyed&quot; at New York&#039;s Plato&#039;s Retreat in the 1970s and 80s and the physical and mental abuse he dished out to USAID contractor Melody Townsel in Moscow and Bishkek in 1994, he will face the kind of scrutiny he&#039;s never before experienced. The Russians clearly have the goods on Bolton from his past antics in New York, Moscow, Bishkek and they will be doubly sure to have him under heavy surveillance at the UN. Ditto the Chinese, the Arabs, Cubans, Venezuelans, Brazilians, French, South and North Koreans, Germans, South Africans, Iranians, Indians, Turks, Spanish, Canadians, and others. One screw up by Bolton, one temper tantrum, one sexual indiscretion, one episode involving espionage with the intelligence service of a so-called U.S. &quot;ally&quot; in the Middle East, and it will be surely leaked to the UN press corps and New York&#039;s scandal-hungry media. And then Bush and Rice will have to decide if they want a discredited clown like Bolton continuing to represent the United States -- and if they do -- the American people may decide otherwise and that will hammer yet another nail in the coffin of the Bush dynasty, the Republican Party, and the neocon movement.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omer, </p>
<p>You mention Mr. Bolton&#8217;s &#8220;sordid past&#8221;.</p>
<p>Wayne Madsen (<a href="http://waynemadsenreport.com" rel="nofollow">http://waynemadsenreport.com</a>) is confident of a sordid FUTURE as well:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The swaggering dolt in the White House believes that his recess appointment (announced by the White House on Aug. 1) of the boorish John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, his mustachioed gunslinger and sworn liar will go to the East River in Manhattan and shake up the international organization and kick and whip them into kow-towing to the neocon line. What Bolton doesn&#8217;t realize is that he will be be now working and living in a virtual fish bowl. Bolton will not only be under the scrutiny of intelligence agents that at least three-quarters of the 191 members of the UN place within their missions and the UN Secretariat and specialized agencies, but also the UN staff itself, an aggressive UN press corps, and an intensely anti-Bush population of New York City and its suburbs. So, if Mr. Bolton decides to engage in the type of group sex activities he once &#8220;enjoyed&#8221; at New York&#8217;s Plato&#8217;s Retreat in the 1970s and 80s and the physical and mental abuse he dished out to USAID contractor Melody Townsel in Moscow and Bishkek in 1994, he will face the kind of scrutiny he&#8217;s never before experienced. The Russians clearly have the goods on Bolton from his past antics in New York, Moscow, Bishkek and they will be doubly sure to have him under heavy surveillance at the UN. Ditto the Chinese, the Arabs, Cubans, Venezuelans, Brazilians, French, South and North Koreans, Germans, South Africans, Iranians, Indians, Turks, Spanish, Canadians, and others. One screw up by Bolton, one temper tantrum, one sexual indiscretion, one episode involving espionage with the intelligence service of a so-called U.S. &#8220;ally&#8221; in the Middle East, and it will be surely leaked to the UN press corps and New York&#8217;s scandal-hungry media. And then Bush and Rice will have to decide if they want a discredited clown like Bolton continuing to represent the United States &#8212; and if they do &#8212; the American people may decide otherwise and that will hammer yet another nail in the coffin of the Bush dynasty, the Republican Party, and the neocon movement.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate-A</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate-A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I lean toward agreement that BushCo needs a &quot;similar event&quot; as 9/11.  Not so much for ratings, but to expand war.    Mulling this, it&#039;s my belief, if another &quot;attack&quot; takes place it will likely be &quot;dirty bomb.&quot;  

I&#039;d move if I resided in any predominantly non-white locale right now.  Say, East St. Louis, South side Chicago.  OTOH, any building that houses information the neocons want to bury would be a good choice.

If we&#039;re lucky, they&#039;ll take the money made to date and run, leaving the Democrats to take office for 4 years or so while the neocons regroup.

Personally, I don&#039;t think the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://kateablog.blogspot.com/2005/08/autopsy-report-un.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UN or appointment of Bolton&lt;/A&gt; makes much difference.  It&#039;s all a sham, always has been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lean toward agreement that BushCo needs a &#8220;similar event&#8221; as 9/11.  Not so much for ratings, but to expand war.    Mulling this, it&#8217;s my belief, if another &#8220;attack&#8221; takes place it will likely be &#8220;dirty bomb.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d move if I resided in any predominantly non-white locale right now.  Say, East St. Louis, South side Chicago.  OTOH, any building that houses information the neocons want to bury would be a good choice.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re lucky, they&#8217;ll take the money made to date and run, leaving the Democrats to take office for 4 years or so while the neocons regroup.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think the <a HREF="http://kateablog.blogspot.com/2005/08/autopsy-report-un.html" rel="nofollow">UN or appointment of Bolton</a> makes much difference.  It&#8217;s all a sham, always has been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anwaar Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwaar Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hello Omer. You are on the dot as usual.

I wrote a similar piece today. Here is an excerpt from it;

&quot;So what can be done to check the rising trend of disapproval of the President’s Job handling rating in the meanwhile? To answer this question, let us first see what were the most apparent reasons for the high approval ratings of the year 2001? These were;

1. The event of 9/11/2001.
2. A tidal wave of national and international sympathy post-9/11/2001.

Let us take a cue from the polls sited at the beginning. A whopping 84 % of respondents approved the President’s job handling immediately post 9/11/2001, with only 11 % disapproving. If the President’s job handling approval ratings have to go back up to that level, a similar event must take place. That is a no-brainer.

One cannot be ‘date certain’ but another 9/11 seems to be the only option. It is as simple as that. There is one exception though. This coming 9/11 has to be bloodier, more spectacular and more devastating than the earlier 9/11. For not only the emerging doubts in the American public’s mind have to be erased but the approval ratings too have to be brought back to the post original 9/11 time for the next phase of Empire building exercise to take off--a double task.

Any ideas that come to mind for the weapon of choice?&quot; 

The link to the article is;

http://malakandsky.blogspot.com/2005/08/coming-911-for-dummies.html

Keep up the great work.

Anwaar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Omer. You are on the dot as usual.</p>
<p>I wrote a similar piece today. Here is an excerpt from it;</p>
<p>&#8220;So what can be done to check the rising trend of disapproval of the President’s Job handling rating in the meanwhile? To answer this question, let us first see what were the most apparent reasons for the high approval ratings of the year 2001? These were;</p>
<p>1. The event of 9/11/2001.<br />
2. A tidal wave of national and international sympathy post-9/11/2001.</p>
<p>Let us take a cue from the polls sited at the beginning. A whopping 84 % of respondents approved the President’s job handling immediately post 9/11/2001, with only 11 % disapproving. If the President’s job handling approval ratings have to go back up to that level, a similar event must take place. That is a no-brainer.</p>
<p>One cannot be ‘date certain’ but another 9/11 seems to be the only option. It is as simple as that. There is one exception though. This coming 9/11 has to be bloodier, more spectacular and more devastating than the earlier 9/11. For not only the emerging doubts in the American public’s mind have to be erased but the approval ratings too have to be brought back to the post original 9/11 time for the next phase of Empire building exercise to take off&#8211;a double task.</p>
<p>Any ideas that come to mind for the weapon of choice?&#8221; </p>
<p>The link to the article is;</p>
<p><a href="http://malakandsky.blogspot.com/2005/08/coming-911-for-dummies.html" rel="nofollow">http://malakandsky.blogspot.com/2005/08/coming-911-for-dummies.html</a></p>
<p>Keep up the great work.</p>
<p>Anwaar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid</title>
		<link>http://www.theoliveream.com/2005/08/05/nuts-bolton/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theoliveream.com/?p=38#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Another great post, always worth waiting for.

I was practically p***ing myself with laughter when I got to &quot;moustachioed freak&quot;. Awesome.

Yes, the neoconts are going to go after Iran, one of the few Muslim countries that seems to be getting its act together it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post, always worth waiting for.</p>
<p>I was practically p***ing myself with laughter when I got to &#8220;moustachioed freak&#8221;. Awesome.</p>
<p>Yes, the neoconts are going to go after Iran, one of the few Muslim countries that seems to be getting its act together it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

